Alright, people, we’ve got to address a serious problem facing our community. We’ve all faced it, felt its effects, and yet we continue to let it permeate our dancing.
That’s right. I’m talking about our failure to properly compress.
Let’s get something straight: compression is a kind of connection, and connection is the result of movement. In this case, the movement of one partner towards the other, or both partners towards each other. Compression happens as the partners get close together and reach the closest they can get. The prime example of compression is the push break, one of the most basic and fundamental patterns of the dance, where the follower moves into the leader, creating compression, and then is sent back to the end of the slot.
So compression happens as one partner moves closer to the other, but it’s not so simple – there’s more to it than that. In order to create compression, some fundamental technique must be in place.
For one, the partners must maintain their posture, such that they are moving from their centers and their centers are in front of their feet. At the same time, they should be holding their own weight, and not leaning forward such that their partner are supporting most of their weight. Of course, all too often, during a push break, you see followers who not only don’t bring their centers forward, but actually lean back, reaching with their feet and pushing their hips forward instead.
This leads me to the second important technique: following through. On a push break, the compression results from the follower moving into the leader, but frequently followers slow and stop themselves before they get to full compression. Not only is this anticipating (and thus poor following) but it is poor technique and sacrifices proper connection. The follower must continue and go forward as far as she can, making the leader do the work of slowing her down and stopping her by absorbing her weight as she comes in. (The leader should allow the follower to come in and compress, rather than abruptly stopping her by keeping his arms out in front of him. Which leads me to my next point…)
Third, we call this compression because there is actual compressing involved – compressing of the frame. If the arms, shoulders, and elbows are relaxed (as part of proper frame), then as the leader draws the follower in, his hands will get closer to his center, and as the follower moves into the leader, she will move her center in towards her hands. As a result, the distance between the partners narrows, and the pattern is literally compressed. This elasticity in the arms is also what creates the elasticity in the connection, providing a build up of energy during compression that facilitates the movement out of compression.
Finally, while some people may learn to create compression by doing all of the above, there is still the matter of properly and effectively exiting from compression. If compression results from the follower moving into the leader, then the next natural movement is to have the follower move away from the leader. As always, whenever there is a change of direction, the leader should initiate from his center (rather than his arms) and the follower should wait for his signal and then be proactive in her response. On top of this, the partners should not push the other away – pushing engages the arm muscles and creates a jarring experience for the partner. Rather, the leader should initiate the follower away with his body only, and the follower should send her center away from her own hands (the reverse of compressing). This is not only a more comfortable way to exit, but it ensures both partners maintain their posture and thus are more balanced and stable in their movement.
Compression is a difficult to master as extension, though we rarely spend as much time working on it. However, a focus on maintaining the fundamental technique of movement – from the center with proper frame – can dramatically improve one’s compression along with any other change in connection.
What are your observations of how people compress on the dance floor? What goes wrong and when does it feel right? At what point in your dance education did you first learn compression and what were you taught? At what point after you first learned about compression did you feel you learned how to do it properly? And teachers, how do you approach the subject with your students? What exercises or approaches have you found to work best in order to help your students understand and execute properly?
I think the real issue here, is why this song wasnt played during the class http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4onJ7Z2MLI
I second your implied obversations, Eric. On the social floor it is generally not seen correctly done — majority are not compressing or are doing a "patty-cake" hand towards the partner and/or BOUNCING off of each other (as if ran into a brick wall rather than an absorption).Consequently, I do not do as the majority of others do. I do not teach "push break" as the first pattern. I teach left and right passes. In the third lesson they get their first push break. I can't remember who or what taught me compression of a push break or tuck … but I DO remember the mental concepts given that gave me the "Aha!" moments. (Because we all know, that it's usually a culmination of several trials before we get it right.)I have since then used these over and over with some success. And I don't introduce them all at once but rather over the next few lessons, massaging and adapting little by little. The first concept was this: If a toddler came running towards you and leapt at you, would you just stand there and let them bounce off of you? No, you would absorb (while remaining strong so you both don't go down) and then you set them back. Another concept was then added: The movement of the arms is more like a glider rather than a rocking chair. In order to feel better, frame (torso – back and abdominals) stays contracted so that when the incoming mass reaches a certain amount of pressure — like a coiled spring depressed, the entire torso becomes involved with the sending away.And the winning concept: Pushing a car. With either your own hands or with another car. If you don't maintain and absorb you get bounce-smack. Both objects must maintain even pressure against each other.And some people never get it. LOL
Thanks, Maria – and great to have you posting again :)I don't teach the push break as the first pattern either. Like you, I teach passes first to establish the fundamentals of movement. I know of some teachers, however, who postpone teaching push breaks until much later, on the grounds that compression is just too hard to get early on. I would argue better to learn it right and early so they can spend more time working on it, but that's just my philosophy…The exercise I learned from Paul Overton and Sharon Ashe (and which I've modified a bit) is to have the students compress with each other or with a wall, and focus on taking their centers in towards their own hands/the wall and then sending themselves away from their hands/the wall – as opposed to send their hands/the wall away from them. This teaches proper posture, compression of the frame, and how to successfully exit.
This is so far the most mentally challenging concept for me that we've covered. I've spent a lot of time trying to tighten my back and shoulders as far as they'll go, to the point of doing a variety of pull exercises in the gym. I guess my idea was trying to get a responsive frame (or the furthest opposite from a spaghetti frame lol). So its taken considerable faith to relax my frame and let it really compress. Hopefully with practice my body will come to understand the merits of an elastic frame. (Why I didn't make the connection between wcs being described as "elastic", and needing to have a more elastic frame I don't know lol)
How about the analogy of pushing a child on a swing. You know how you receive and send, receive and send, no pushing or jarring.